SEO for dentists, built around your treatment list

Every provider below was read on its own page through our fetch box, and the row says what that page published on the day we read it. 5 of 24 publish a figure; the rest are listed too, because how many will not quote a number is the most useful thing about this market. Nothing here is a quote for your job: it is what other people advertise.

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2). 5 of the 24 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 18 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 1 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere. The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 222 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded. Derivation as chartered: the median, quartiles and full range of the published monthly fee by practice size (single site, two to four dentists, group), by treatment focus (general, Invisalign, implants, orthodontics) and by city; the DISAGREEMENT measured rather than averaged away - every published band recorded with its publisher and date so one firm's four pages stating four different ranges is visible as a fact about the market; the treatment premium (20-30% for Invisalign, 25-40% for implants on one publisher's reading) tested against the rate cards that actually price by treatment; the fee expressed as a share of practice turnover against the market's own 8-12% rule; and the in-house alternative (£800-£2,500 a month part-time, against a £35,000-£50,000 salary) on the same axis

“Dental SEO Price Index”, SEO for dentists, https://seodentists.uk/ (updated 2026-09-21).